Written by:
Carina Wyborn
Elena Louder
Jerry Harrison
Jensen Montambault
Jasper Montan
Melanie Ryan
Carsten Nesshöver
Andrew Pullin
Mark Reed
Emilie Dellecker
Jonathan Kramer
James Boyd
Adrian Dellecker
Jonathan Hutton
ASSOCIATED CONTENTPublished by: Environmental Science and Policy Volume, (Aug 2018) 86, Pages 72-84
This paper is on the rationale, approaches to, underlying assumptions, and impact of synthesis initiatives. Findings suggest that research synthesis is having diverse impacts on research, policy and practice including creating a new understanding of problems, establishing new networks, and contributing to changes in policy and practice. These impacts emerged across a range of contexts, synthesis methods, assumptions and operating models. This suggests that there is no single correct way to design research synthesis for impact, but rather a need to tailor the approach for the context of intended use.
Photo by Shane Rounce on Unsplash
This resource is located on an associated third party website.
Enter your name and email address to join the Transforming Evidence email list. You will receive a confirmation email — please click the link in it to complete your subscription.
You can unsubscribe at any time via the Transforming Evidence list page.
You can unsubscribe at any time via the Transforming Evidence list page.